IH-633

[jackgordon]

Anyone have a pair of these? More to the point, does anyone know how they really compare to the 634?

They're described as being just like the 634 with a taper, but the size charts suggest to me they're slimmer all the way down.

I'm asking because I have a feeling I really need some IH 21oz flagship denim in my life.

[ickes]

Sept 2, 2016 20:33:37 GMT -6 jackgordon said:

Anyone have a pair of these? More to the point, does anyone know how they really compare to the 634?

They're described as being just like the 634 with a taper, but the size charts suggest to me they're slimmer all the way down.

I'm asking because I have a feeling I really need some IH 21oz flagship denim in my life.

I have a pair and I have several pairs of the 634s. My 633's arent exactly apples to apples though as they are a loomstate pair. I will say though that they definitely taper more and have a smaller cuff than the 634's.

[jackgordon]

I understand that they taper to the hem, but are they also slimmer through the thigh? That's what it looks like from the size charts.

For example according to Self Edge:

634 in size 34 has a 33.3" waist and 12.8" thigh

633 in size 33 has a 34" waist and a 12.5" thigh

I get that size charts aren't always the most accurate things; I was just looking for an answer to whether the 633 is more fitted/slimmer than the 634 aside from the taper.

By the numbers the 633 seems like a golden cut for me. Most of the Iron Heart cuts with neglible taper from knee to hem end up looking a bit bootcut.

[exophobe]

Sept 2, 2016 21:02:30 GMT -6 jackgordon said:

I understand that they taper to the hem, but are they also slimmer through the thigh? That's what it looks like from the size charts.

For example according to Self Edge:

634 in size 34 has a 33.3" waist and 12.8" thigh

633 in size 33 has a 34" waist and a 12.5" thigh

I get that size charts aren't always the most accurate things; I was just looking for an answer to whether the 633 is more fitted/slimmer than the 634 aside from the taper.

By the numbers the 633 seems like a golden cut for me. Most of the Iron Heart cuts with neglible taper from knee to hem end up looking a bit bootcut.

The good news is that the measurements provided at ihuk are based on the actual production run. Which specific pairs are you looking at?

[ickes]

Sept 2, 2016 21:02:30 GMT -6 jackgordon said:

I understand that they taper to the hem, but are they also slimmer through the thigh? That's what it looks like from the size charts.

For example according to Self Edge:

634 in size 34 has a 33.3" waist and 12.8" thigh

633 in size 33 has a 34" waist and a 12.5" thigh

I get that size charts aren't always the most accurate things; I was just looking for an answer to whether the 633 is more fitted/slimmer than the 634 aside from the taper.

By the numbers the 633 seems like a golden cut for me. Most of the Iron Heart cuts with neglible taper from knee to hem end up looking a bit bootcut.

Well in regards to my pair they are absolutely a slimmer fit all the way around. Lower rise..smaller upper block,,etc. They are a slim fit.

I would highly recommend you try the 777 fit. It's my favorite IH fit and is exactly what you're looking for I think.

[jackgordon]

Sept 2, 2016 21:17:28 GMT -6 ickes said:

Well in regards to my pair they are absolutely a slimmer fit all the way around. Lower rise..smaller upper block,,etc. They are a slim fit.

I would highly recommend you try the 777 fit. It's my favorite IH fit and is exactly what you're looking for I think.

Good to hear they are slimmer than the 634.

I've got a pair of 555-03 so I reckon the 777 won't work for me because of the lower front and back rise. I've thought about the 555-01 but don't want indigo jeans quite that slim.. I'm looking for a little more room in the thigh and especially the knee, which I know I'll get from the 633, I just don't want too much more room.

Thanks ickes.

[jackgordon]

But IHUK don't sell the 633, so I don't think they have a size chart for them.